Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th Jun 2010 22:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 429307
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Innovation is leaps-forward in technology, not taking existing technology and re-designing the front-end.
Obviously I'm not tarnishing all of Apple's developments as being like this.
Actually most of what Apple does is exactly what you describe. But it is not tarnishing anything by admitting that, because it is still innovation.
The benefits of good user interface design are sometimes difficult to quantify, but you must admit there is a big difference between simply incorporating a technology like touch-screens, and finding a way to make them natural, fluid, and fun to use. There is a great deal of ingenuity involved in designing a product that--purely from a user experience perspective--is able to make a user want to use it rather than feel obligated to use it. How is that not innovation?
Edited 2010-06-09 21:34 UTC