Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Jun 2010 21:56 UTC
Windows Yes, the day is finally drawing closer: the day Windows XP died. October 22, 2010 will be the final and definitive day for the venerable operating system, since OEMs will no longer be able to pre-load it on netbooks after that day. I might not make myself popular around here with this, but thank god, it's about time that pile of junk is taken behind the shed.
Thread beginning with comment 429839
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: XP64 == XP
by WereCatf on Sat 12th Jun 2010 08:07 UTC in reply to "RE: XP64 == XP"
WereCatf
Member since:
2006-02-15

But if the machine has a 2GB or more of memory and a halfway decent video card I cannot fathom any good reason to use XP

I have an Athlon 64 2Ghz, 2GB RAM and GeForce 7600GT... and guess what? XP DOES indeed run better on it than 7! You people seem to think 7 is comparable to the second coming of Jesus, but it's not. It doesn't provide any significant features I can't get with XP already and it actually runs worse. Since I mostly use my PC for gaming having less resources available for the game does matter.

7 is good, I give that, but I still prefer XP over it.

Reply Parent Score: 11

RE[3]: XP64 == XP
by another_sam on Sat 12th Jun 2010 10:43 in reply to "RE[2]: XP64 == XP"
another_sam Member since:
2009-08-19

I agree. 7 does not have any additional feature I want and uses double CPU, triple RAM and quadruple hard disk. lol.

If Company of Heroes doesn't work on Wine by the time I change my laptop I'll have rethink my gaming strategy or install 7 knowing that is a waste of energy.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: XP64 == XP
by WereCatf on Sat 12th Jun 2010 10:51 in reply to "RE[3]: XP64 == XP"
WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

If Company of Heroes doesn't work on Wine by the time I change my laptop I'll have rethink my gaming strategy or install 7 knowing that is a waste of energy.

http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=45...

Looks like a recent version of Company of Heroes does work without a hitch in any recent version of Wine. I just suggest getting a machine with nVidia card, I've never had issues with those whereas I always run into one or another issue with ATi ones.

Cheers ;)

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: XP64 == XP
by REM2000 on Sat 12th Jun 2010 16:37 in reply to "RE[2]: XP64 == XP"
REM2000 Member since:
2006-07-25

If you are a gamer then and upgrade to Windows 7 simply for DirectX 10/11. More and more games are moving over.

I have a Quad Core Intel, 2GB RAM, nVidia 9800.

I used to run WindowsXP as this machine is mainly for games (I use a mac for my day to day stuff at home).

Windows 7 offers a lot more than XP. Better file transfers and file operations as 7 makes better use of memory for caching data. I notice a big difference when copying files to my server.

Better use of the cores and video cards provides a noticeably faster machine. However also usability wise windows 7 provides a more easier and faster system to interact with, aero peek i couldn't do without and it really makes a difference when using a computer daily both at home for games and at work for work related tasks.

I never was a fan of XP, i much preferred Windows 2000. However 7 does offer a lot and makes greater use of modern hardware.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[4]: XP64 == XP
by WereCatf on Sat 12th Jun 2010 19:06 in reply to "RE[3]: XP64 == XP"
WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

I used to run WindowsXP as this machine is mainly for games (I use a mac for my day to day stuff at home).

Windows 7 offers a lot more than XP. Better file transfers and file operations as 7 makes better use of memory for caching data. I notice a big difference when copying files to my server.


Copying stuff to/from server isn't related to gaming. Personally, I have not noticed any difference in network performance between XP and 7, perhaps due to still using 100mbit/s where the bottle cap is the network, not the performance of either of the computers themselves. If you notice a difference of performance in 100mbit/s network then you have had something configured really wrong or malfunctioning drivers I'd say.

Better use of the cores and video cards provides a noticeably faster machine.

My framerate in WoW dropped from 37fps to 13fps between XP and 7. "Faster" isn't the wording I'd use. However, for multicore machines I do suspect 7 would do better than XP. 7 has a better refined scheduler.

aero peek i couldn't do without and it really makes a difference when using a computer daily both at home for games and at work for work related tasks.

That is indeed a pretty handy ability, but that's still not related to gaming, really. And I can't remember the name of the application which does provide the same feature for XP, so it's not something you need to buy 7 in order to have.

Reply Parent Score: 2