Linked by Kroc Camen on Tue 22nd Jun 2010 12:46 UTC
Amiga & AROS The fabled Amiga X1000 has been spotted in the wild, in the homeliest of places--Station X, a.k.a Bletchley Park. "The AmigaOne X1000 is a custom dual core PowerPC board with plenty of modern ports and I/O interfaces. It runs AmigaOS 4, and is supported by Hyperion, a partner in the project. The most interesting bit, though, is the use of an 500Mhz XCore co-processor, which the X1000's hardware designer describes as a descendant of the transputer - once the great hope of British silicon." With thanks to Jason McGint, 'Richard' and Pascal Papara for submissions.
Thread beginning with comment 431197
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
bugjacobs
Member since:
2009-01-03

How could people know the first AmigaOnes from Eyetech would be so bugged ? And that Amiga Inc would fail them !? Besides the failing chips was as far as I know due to a flawed reference board from some Asian manufacturerer (?) Luckily I didnt buy any of them .. I hope Trevor Dickinson is more lucky with his hardware partner, (who seems to be A LOT more reliable .. )

Edited 2010-06-23 09:10 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

aliquis Member since:
2005-07-23

Bugged and bugged.

MorphOS was already there. The hardware to.
The Pegasos wouldn't get AmigaOS, just that, just let the alternative die so we don't end up with two branches.
The Pegasos was cheaper.
B-plan/Genesi was infinity + 1 better than any company which have ever owned Amiga, don't know about the Amiga Tech people though, we lost them fast .. ;D. Eyetech may have been good people, what do I know, way to much hardware and high prices anyway, and still same shitty old Amiga-whatever-company behind it all.

Pegasos + MorphOS was good, sure the A\Box or whatever might had ended up better, or the maybe the AmigaMMC + QNX Neutrino based OS. But to base a new one on Linux or keep on updating the same old piece of shit (AmigaOS 3.5 and 3.9 are jokes to, though I haven't used them.)

Sad for Genesi to not get it flying even higher.

<quote>And that Amiga Inc would fail them !?</quote>Well duh, isn't that obvious? Bla bla AmigaDE.. hurray .. Windows CE-products! ..

Reply Parent Score: 2

Raffaele Member since:
2005-11-12

Bugged and bugged. MorphOS was already there. The hardware to. The Pegasos wouldn't get AmigaOS


Just to correct your erroneous statement but Pegasos runs all Amiga-Like Operating Systems. It runs also AmigaOS.

I knew it because I own a Peggy II. ;-)

Pegasos + MorphOS was good, sure the A\Box or whatever might had ended up better, or the maybe the AmigaMMC + QNX Neutrino based OS. But to base a new one on Linux or keep on updating the same old piece of shit (AmigaOS 3.5 and 3.9 are jokes to, though I haven't used them.)


No, Linux no, please... I don't want that Shi**y Geek-Only Operating System.

It is not friendly at all.

You must achieve a Computer Science Degree to learn how to full using it, or the alternative is to stay stuck with its basic features without any possibility of digging it and discovering all its power.

Studying for a Computer Science Degree to learn how to use an Operating System in its deep it is sorta like a nightmare!

That is why Amiga is perfect. It does not require a Computer Science Degree to be mastered by any user.

Linux is not an OS suitable for any people and for anyday use.

AmigaOS is good. MorphOS is good. AROS is good.

Also I hope that soon we will see a version of MorphOS running from its Q-Box even if this means to deprecate the Amiga A-Box.

At least the A-Box could run in sort of sandbox, or the Amiga API could be just run under complete emulation, so that Q-Box could reveal all its power!

Edited 2010-06-23 16:05 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2