Linked by David Adams on Thu 24th Jun 2010 16:22 UTC, submitted by Governa
Thread beginning with comment 431391
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by anevilyak
by lemur2 on Fri 25th Jun 2010 01:07
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by anevilyak"
Its best not to try to hide this - better to say the truth which is that the Android way is freer but less secure. Its up to the end user what model they prefer more. The Android way where you get less security (and fewer apps) but those apps are distributed in a more decentralised and and less controlled way. Or the Apple way where there are more apps and their distribution and quality control is more restrictive. Then leave the consumer to select the model they prefer. I think the consumer will prefer safety (given the general experience of consumers during the Windows dominated desktop era) but I could be wrong - the end users will decide through their purchasing decisions.
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-activates-160000-android-phon...
Whoa! Google Android Activations Leap 60% In A Month
Three reasons for all the ubiquity:
Google's Android software is a strong second to Apple's iPhone software.
Android is free for manufacturers to install, so it's on a lot of phones.
Android is being distributed by a ton of carriers, including all four major U.S. carriers, while Apple is still exclusive to AT&T in the U.S.
Three reasons for all the ubiquity:
Google's Android software is a strong second to Apple's iPhone software.
Android is free for manufacturers to install, so it's on a lot of phones.
Android is being distributed by a ton of carriers, including all four major U.S. carriers, while Apple is still exclusive to AT&T in the U.S.
I'm not so sure about that "strong second" notion, particularly in markets other than the US. Like this:
http://ausdroid.net/
Edited 2010-06-25 01:11 UTC




Member since:
2009-08-22
Of course malware is less likely on the Apple App Store than Android market. That's one the benefits of Apple's curated app distribution model with its built in quality control system. Its actually the main reason Apple do it that way.
Its best not to try to hide this - better to say the truth which is that the Android way is freer but less secure.
Its up to the end user what model they prefer more. The Android way where you get less security (and fewer apps) but those apps are distributed in a more decentralised and and less controlled way. Or the Apple way where there are more apps and their distribution and quality control is more restrictive.
Then leave the consumer to select the model they prefer.
I think the consumer will prefer safety (given the general experience of consumers during the Windows dominated desktop era) but I could be wrong - the end users will decide through their purchasing decisions.