Linked by lopisaur on Fri 25th Jun 2010 22:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 431610
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Qt treats GTK/Gnome similar to how it treats OS X and Windows these days: it assumes the widget styles of the system. To use a Qt/KDE theme on a Gnome desktop, you actually have to jump through hoops, which I think is a very good thing.
Yes, but the problem is that Gtk+ doesn't do the same. Running Gtk+ apps on KDE is still kind of painful.
Whether GTK is or isn't inferior, there is no denying that it is faster to take advantage of native Linux features.
No, I think you have that backwards. (And what native linux features are you talking about?) Qt is the one that jumps through hoops to look like Gtk+, while Gtk+ doesn't play very nicely on a KDE desktop.
That's a problem with GTK+, not with X11. Go complain to the GTK+ devs to get their heads out of the sand, stop with the NIH, and start co-operating with others.
It's amazing how often QT/KDE devs bend over backwards to make GTK+/GNOME interoperate and look nice on a non-GNOME system ... and how rarely it's reciprocated.





Member since:
2005-08-07
In fact, no theming is even necessary. Qt treats GTK/Gnome similar to how it treats OS X and Windows these days: it assumes the widget styles of the system. To use a Qt/KDE theme on a Gnome desktop, you actually have to jump through hoops, which I think is a very good thing.
Whether GTK is or isn't inferior, there is no denying that it is faster to take advantage of native Linux features.