Linked by lopisaur on Fri 25th Jun 2010 22:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 431614
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That's a problem with GTK+, not with X11. Go complain to the GTK+ devs to get their heads out of the sand, stop with the NIH, and start co-operating with others.
It's amazing how often QT/KDE devs bend over backwards to make GTK+/GNOME interoperate and look nice on a non-GNOME system ... and how rarely it's reciprocated.
That's a problem with GTK+, not with X11.
Yes, I know that. That was my whole point.
It's amazing how often QT/KDE devs bend over backwards to make GTK+/GNOME interoperate and look nice on a non-GNOME system ... and how rarely it's reciprocated.
I know. It annoys me because Qt/KDE does all the extra work and has way better technology, but I just really don't like KDE that much. So I use GNOME, even though it feels like I'm stuck in 2005 and Gtk+/GNOME is technologically inferior in practically every way.





Member since:
2009-10-04
Yes, but the problem is that Gtk+ doesn't do the same. Running Gtk+ apps on KDE is still kind of painful.
No, I think you have that backwards. (And what native linux features are you talking about?) Qt is the one that jumps through hoops to look like Gtk+, while Gtk+ doesn't play very nicely on a KDE desktop.