Linked by David Adams on Tue 27th Jul 2010 07:31 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Thread beginning with comment 434706
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Given the fact that RedHat goes out of its way to help rebuild RHEL (E.g. by releasing SRPMs instead of tarballs and patches, making EPEL free-for-all, etc), I fail to see any evidence to this supposed opposition.
I care little what some people in RedHat -may- or may not think, I very much care about what RedHat -does-.
Bullshit. Pure and simple.
I -really- suggest you do some reading before posting.
Start by learning the difference between Fedora-proper and EPEL.
P.S. We use large number of CentOS/EPEL machines for development and use RHEL machines for production. This is not an attack on CentOS in any way.
- Gilboa
Edited 2010-07-29 07:02 UTC