Linked by David Adams on Tue 3rd Aug 2010 16:05 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Thread beginning with comment 435241
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: You have to give Canonical one thing
by danieldk on Tue 3rd Aug 2010 20:57
in reply to "RE: You have to give Canonical one thing"
You are very right. One of the things that contributed to the end of paid distributions was Ubuntu. I was part of the very small Libranet team, and I always felt this was one of the reasons of Libranet's demise. It's hard to compete with a multi-millionaire who ships stacks of free CDs to anyone requesting it. Still, for many years after its demise, Libranet's installer and administration tools were far more user-friendly and useful than Ubuntu's counterparts. This was all written by two paid guys and managed by another paid guy. Of course, Ubuntu was not the only cause of Libranet's end, but certainly a contributing factor.
I feel very sorry for Mindriva and its users that it may have the same fate.
Edited 2010-08-03 20:58 UTC
RE[3]: You have to give Canonical one thing
by sorpigal on Wed 4th Aug 2010 17:27
in reply to "RE[2]: You have to give Canonical one thing"





Member since:
2005-07-06
That, though, is where Canonical has focused its efforts, and made more progress than any other organization as far as I can tell -- including Novell/SuSE, Redhat, and various other distros.
SUSE/openSUSE and Mandrake/Mandriva focused on desktop Linux much before Ubuntu existed. True, not all their releases were perfect, but many were.
For me Ubuntu has meant nothing but bugs.
Heck, even Lindows/Linspire was a great "Joe User" distro (before going 'buntu)
Or Xandros.
Why did they die? Because Ubuntu taught people you don't have to pay for a Linux distro.
Personally I was more than happy to pay for good distros, like the great, unrivalled Libranet.