Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Aug 2010 22:58 UTC, submitted by Alex Forster
Thread beginning with comment 436756
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Integration talks, i.e. after purchase.
'Confirming' incorrect rumours spread by biased party? Puhlease, all this negative Java panic.. in such a case, Oracle is required to notify infringers to allow them to remedy situation - it would be enough to replace harmony libs with openjdk (to get implied patent grants from oracle) and gpl dalvik.
Situation with Oracle owning Java sucks, but openjdk + jcp is much better than anything else OSS has in this space.