Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Aug 2010 17:54 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 437499
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't think anyone is threatening intel on the windows front.
This doesn't mean a company shouldn't continue doing R&D to ensure their position.
Console gaming, handheld gaming, smartphones...intel is nowhere to be found in these recent high growth markets.
On mobile device front, read up on upcoming technologies like Moorestown and MeeGo. Intel has lots to prove there, and being a challenger has its benefits (in terms of motivation, agility, ...)




Member since:
2006-01-06
I don't think anyone is threatening intel on the windows front. The core i7 is pretty impressive and shows what intel can do when they aren't letting the marketing department make all the technology decisions. If anything intel should be very concerned with their problem: "if it isn't running windows it's not running an intel processor". Console gaming, handheld gaming, smartphones...intel is nowhere to be found in these recent high growth markets. And AMD...they should consider renaming themselves to ATI...
ARM seems to have a brighter future than intel at this moment.
Edited 2010-08-19 18:58 UTC