To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
PulseAudio is a work project and systemd is more of a spare time project. These are both being developed in parallel and unlike PulseAudio which would probably require ongoing work for new features etc, systemd is reaching closer to a bug fix only mode. Unless you are paying someone to do the work, you can't dictate how they spend their time.
I'm concerned about the claim about it entering "bugfix mode". Just from ideas I've seen from Lennart, there's implementing cron-like behavior and making systemd work for user-level services. There's also some interesting space to explore with cgroups. Without all of this, systemd is less interesting. Add that's not even counting concerns about the current system's complete ability to replace the status quo, or even anything to do with user interaction points and tools. Therefore, if after another month it gets declared done and he moves on, it'd be a shame if other developers don't pick up from there.





Member since:
2007-09-22
"it seems to be coming along very fast (as opposed to, say, PulseAudio
)"
Then please let him stop developing on systemd, we don't need it that hard and get back to fixing PulseAudio. :-)