Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Aug 2010 23:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 438441
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by kaiwai
by JAlexoid on Sun 29th Aug 2010 23:30
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by kaiwai"
Actually Cloud Computing does not imply how H/W is designed(centralized or otherwise). Cloud Computing implies that resources are virtual and can exist anywhere.
And Mainframes(especially System Z) are very well prepared for that... System Z and it's predecessors had virtualization built into them for decades...
You put in 2 System Z's(second one for geographic redundancy), connect them together and if one fails, the other can pick up the load as if nothing happened....
RE[5]: Comment by kaiwai
by tylerdurden on Tue 31st Aug 2010 01:04
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by kaiwai"




Member since:
2009-03-17
Not, really. The whole point of cloud computing is lack of centralization. Which the mainframe implies.
Mainframes are good for mission critical processing, and IBM has a bit of a monopoly in certain transactional markets.