Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 14th Sep 2010 22:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 441127
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: You obviously don't get open source
by apoclypse on Wed 15th Sep 2010 13:02
in reply to "RE[5]: You obviously don't get open source"
RE[6]: You obviously don't get open source
by felipec on Wed 15th Sep 2010 22:18
in reply to "RE[5]: You obviously don't get open source"
His logic is fine.
An apple is like a banana. They're both fruits.
Canonical is like a priest who sins but pays taxes. They are both evil.
An apple is like a banana. They're both fruits.
Canonical is like a priest who sins but pays taxes. They are both evil.
Can't you follow logic?
A=Everyone must pay taxes
B=Priest pays taxes
C=Priest hasn't abused children
A=1, B=1
C remains indeterminable; IOW A and B are irrelevant
A=GPL doesn't enforce contributions
B=Canonical follows the GPL
C=Canonical doesn't contribute
A=1, B=1
C remains indeterminable; IOW A and B are irrelevant
Is that clear, or do you need a diagram?
RE[7]: You obviously don't get open source
by dragossh on Thu 16th Sep 2010 15:31
in reply to "RE[6]: You obviously don't get open source"





Member since:
2008-12-16
His logic is fine.
An apple is like a banana. They're both fruits.
Canonical is like a priest who sins but pays taxes. They are both evil.