Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 14th Sep 2010 22:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 441185
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Ubuntu has not popularized Linux in the real world
by SlackerJack on Wed 15th Sep 2010 20:04
in reply to "Ubuntu has not popularized Linux in the real world"
It's about putting all of these things together right and quiet frankly, no distro has done it properly to the point where it is seamless.
Fedora is good if you purely like FOSS, but it's not going to get anywhere in the desktop market what so ever without providing a seamless way of integrating proprietary software. FOSS is not good enough to replace the NVIDIA binary, codecs or Flash and why Canonical has seamlessly integrated such things into their distro.
openSUSE again fail here but at least prove Flash via the updates, but again because they're purely FOSS, fail to provide any sort of out of the box proprietary install solution besides manually adding repositories.
RE: Ubuntu has not popularized Linux in the real world
by gfx1 on Sat 18th Sep 2010 07:03
in reply to "Ubuntu has not popularized Linux in the real world"




Member since:
2009-08-26
I have only met 2 people in the last 4 years that run Linux on the desktop. Just about everyone who has asked me about Linux viewed it as something that has to do with servers and is somehow a threat to MSFT.
I honestly think Red Hat has done more to popularize Linux in the real world due to mainstream press over their market position.
Sure there have been a thousand digg/reddit articles on Ubuntu but I think they are mostly attracting the same crowd that existed before Ubuntu came along. The teenagers that discovered Ubuntu would have discovered whatever distro was most popular.
Ubuntu has a team of 300 employees and I honestly don't understand what they do all day. The areas where Ubuntu gets compliments like the installer and codec prompts should be handled by a single developer.
I'm not convinced that Ubuntu is anything more than Debian + codec prompts + a marketing budget. I also think that Linux Mint has more potential when it comes to mainstream appeal. Ubuntu has a weird color scheme and the name sounds like a hipster yoga studio.