Linked by mjhi11 on Thu 16th Sep 2010 20:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 441643
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'd love to Build an i7 iMac for less... and I can, If I purchase a lower quality screen with smaller dimensions, and convince myself that an AMD Phenom processor is just as good.
Considering that mostly Mac owners don't use the power of those CPUs to the max(hello, lack of power hungry games...), I'd say that is most cases AMD Phenom is just as good.
PS: If you spec the actual system, you'll find that you pay at least $200 more for an iMac than most other branded systems.
Games? I was thinking Photo editing, Video Editing/Encoding and Music....
AMD Phenom is fine, and so is the i3's and i5's.
PS: If you spec the actual system, you'll find that you pay at least $200 more for an iMac than most other branded systems.
... maybe, IF you max it out with Apple RAM instead of the bare bones 4GB...
These are no longer the days of PPC vs X86.
If anything, people take issue that Apple does not sell a "cheap" box for $300 - $400 that is "good enough" for people who just want to check email, and surf the web...




Member since:
2009-12-13
I'd love to Build an i7 iMac for less... and I can, If I purchase a lower quality screen with smaller dimensions, and convince myself that an AMD Phenom processor is just as good.
What people seem to be arguing here, is that Low End PC's is pretty much all that people need... And this is true, I agree... However, If you are a computer user that needs greater performance, or performance longevity (A small percentage of computer users ~ ergo Mac's small market share of a small market), purchasing a Mac or similarly Spec'd and priced "PC" is reasonable