Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 21st Sep 2010 21:32 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Qt After many months of designing, coding, reviewing, testing and documenting, Qt 4.7.0 is finally ready for the big time. Although it's a little more than nine months since Qt's last feature release (4.6.0 on December 1, 2009), the seeds of some of the new stuff in 4.7 were sown much earlier. Indeed, many of the ideas behind the biggest new feature in Qt 4.7.0, Qt Quick, were born more than two years ago, not long after Qt 4.4 was released
Thread beginning with comment 442273
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Use .NET or Java. Let's not continue to waste time with C++ as it's a horrible language and for most GUI apps, you don't need the "speed" it provides.

Reply Parent Score: 2

turrini Member since:

I think you are horrible.

C first appeared in 1972, C++ in 1983. They're in use today, and will be for the next 40 years.

You will not survive until that, C/C++ will. Neither Java/.NET will.

So who is the horrible here?

Reply Parent Score: 2

siride Member since:

That's also true for COBOL and FORTRAN and MS Windows. Good company, eh? I mean, to be honest, that's really a terrible argument. Christianity as been around for a long time, as has prostitution and murder. Does age really mean anything? Not really. Just because C++ has been around does not mean it's the be-all, end-all.

Look, C++ is not a well-designed, well-implemented language. It's not good for RAD or business apps. It has its pluses, but mostly in the metaprogramming, performance-computing and research arena. For writing business apps, it just doesn't make sense. You have to do so much work, deal with slow and difficult compilers and work around semantics problems in the language. Why bother when you just need to make some forms and DB connections? Just use .NET or Java for that.

Reply Parent Score: 2

axilmar Member since:

Neither language you propose have a good quality GUI library. Swing is very tedious to program, Windows Forms is tied to Windows.

Furthermore, I program real time applications for a living, and I don't think that both languages are suitable for me.

Reply Parent Score: 3

siride Member since:

Guess what, a lot of people use Windows.

Reply Parent Score: 2