Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Sep 2010 23:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 442680
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-10
Why should someone like Google be able to prevent someone from shipping an OS that includes their apps?
Shouldn’t the platform allow any apps, open or closed, regardless of vendor?
What if Linux distributors were not allowed to include an open source VOIP client, if they include Skype. Or no open PDF reader if Adobe reader is used?
Sod them! Google should not have control over other apps if its apps are present too, it’s madness.