Linked by vodoomoth on Fri 24th Sep 2010 22:56 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 442689
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-05-09
The problem with you is that you want Java to be C#. C# has its evolution by that way and we should not expect that Java is going to evolve by the same way:
* Properties: They are just an elegant way of write GetX() and SetX().
* Lambdas: They were part of the JDK 7 release plan, so, you will see them some day... Anyway, you have anonymous classes that do the work.
* LINQ: Beautiful C# extension but could be implemented as a set of libraries.
Java is going to be the "C" of such languages. Nobody is going to rewrite the whole JDK in such languages, so, Java will always be the language where the JDK is going to grow.
Edited 2010-09-25 14:22 UTC