Linked by David Adams on Tue 28th Sep 2010 21:58 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 443121
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by Radio
by Finalzone on Wed 29th Sep 2010 17:30
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Radio"
Bingo. Like other poster stated, both Gimp and Photoshop are good on their own rights. As a freelance designer, I mainly use Gimp for budget reason, lower footprint (Adobe CS product are power hungry). While Photoshop is likely complete due to CMYK support for printing, Gimp lack of support can be completed with Krita (thanks to the ability to import xcf and convert into CMYK).
For me, an excellent design can use any software image tool regardless their quirk.




Member since:
2010-03-08
If it is a single window, I never got this problem.
Since gimp 2.6, tool windows are used. They don't loose focus, don't appear in the taskbar, and you can hide them with TAB. Still think that the problem is using multiple windows ?
And you ? Do you have scientific studies proving that photoshop's UI is better than that of gimp ?
My point is not arguing that GIMP is better. It's that although different, it is very capable, too
Adobe can sell whatever they want, people who need the software for work will buy it anyway. It's called a monopoly. Photoshop CS2-CS3 is a good example of that : no major evolution except that of hardware resource usage.
Funny, I hate inkscape's UI too
This shows best the importance of being used to an interface, IMO.
Edited 2010-09-29 12:14 UTC