Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Oct 2010 22:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 443761
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Better question: What does this have to do with Apple..
by tyrione on Tue 5th Oct 2010 01:22
in reply to "Better question: What does this have to do with Apple.."
The patent is on an In-Box (like you have on your desk) where all new documents are placed on the bottom of the stack and you can see top document and part of several documents under it.
Please note that the documents are always sorted by time...
iTunes sorts by: Album Title, Artist, Song Title (never by added date).
Time Machine: sorts directory snap-shots by time. It doesn't present documents in a stack.
Isn't this patent a algorithm and describes an abstract process? If it is, then it shouldn't be patentable.
Please note that the documents are always sorted by time...
iTunes sorts by: Album Title, Artist, Song Title (never by added date).
Time Machine: sorts directory snap-shots by time. It doesn't present documents in a stack.
Isn't this patent a algorithm and describes an abstract process? If it is, then it shouldn't be patentable.
Hence, Apple is appealing the ruling on all 3 counts.
RE: Better question: What does this have to do with Apple..
by Tony Swash on Tue 5th Oct 2010 10:12
in reply to "Better question: What does this have to do with Apple.."
iTunes sorts by: Album Title, Artist, Song Title (never by added date).
Actually iTunes can do that and I use it all the time such as when I import a bunch of mp3 files and want to enter corrected metadata, so if the artist or album name is screwed up I just sort to show by date imported where I can see the files at the top that need the editing.




Member since:
2008-07-30
The patent is on an In-Box (like you have on your desk) where all new documents are placed on the bottom of the stack and you can see top document and part of several documents under it.
Please note that the documents are always sorted by time...
iTunes sorts by: Album Title, Artist, Song Title (never by added date).
Time Machine: sorts directory snap-shots by time. It doesn't present documents in a stack.
Isn't this patent a algorithm and describes an abstract process? If it is, then it shouldn't be patentable.