Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Oct 2010 21:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 444434
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Agreed. Killing Flash would simply accelerate the rise to prominence of standards for rich content, namely HMTL5/CSS/Fast ECMAscript/SVG.
How are a specification released to promote a proprietary video format, a well-abused document layout specification, a scripting language designed begrudgingly by committee whose sole notable trait has been its Esperantoesque tendancy to create dozens of mutually incompatible subsets, and a dead vector graphic format, in any way a suitable replacement for a format that allows arbitrary code to be executed in a sandbox?
It'd make more sense to call Java or Silverlight a "standard for rich content," although both Java and Silverlight are more "rich content" than "standard."
"Agreed. Killing Flash would simply accelerate the rise to prominence of standards for rich content, namely HMTL5/CSS/Fast ECMAscript/SVG.
How are a specification released to promote a proprietary video format, a well-abused document layout specification, a scripting language designed begrudgingly by committee whose sole notable trait has been its Esperantoesque tendancy to create dozens of mutually incompatible subsets, and a dead vector graphic format, in any way a suitable replacement for a format that allows arbitrary code to be executed in a sandbox? It'd make more sense to call Java or Silverlight a "standard for rich content," although both Java and Silverlight are more "rich content" than "standard." " Firefox 4, Google Chrome and even IE9 all include a quite reasonable implementation of GPU-accelerated HMTL5/CSS/Fast ECMAscript/Canvas/SVG. It doesn't require a plugin. Adobe's tools for creating "rich content" for Flash on websites can also create HMTL5/CSS/Fast ECMAscript/Canvas/SVG output. Enjoy.
BTW: A "standard" is a format or protocol for interoperability between different suppliers. It is not a popularity contest. Silverlight doesn't qualify.
Edited 2010-10-08 00:52 UTC




Member since:
2007-02-17
Agreed. Killing Flash would simply accelerate the rise to prominence of standards for rich content, namely HMTL5/CSS/Fast ECMAscript/SVG.
YouTube would simly switch to HTML5/WebM, offer a WebM code for IE9 users to install, and advise other IE users to install either Chrome or maybe even Firefox/Opera.
YouTube already has encoded to WebM over one million of its most popular videos.