Linked by vivainio on Thu 14th Oct 2010 11:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 445055
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I've also developed with WPF, is awesome but some how it did't take over how it should, why? I don't now.
But if you ask me I think it was opaqued by HTML5 and javascript.
If you want to develop ugly boring business apps, the go ahead and code in MFC or Winforms.
Depends, with WinForms you can do kick ass bussines apps. too, WPF lacks of some goodies WinForms has.
Edited 2010-10-14 14:20 UTC
I've also developed with WPF, is awesome but some how it did't take over how it should, why? I don't now.
But if you ask me I think it was opaqued by HTML5 and javascript.
But if you ask me I think it was opaqued by HTML5 and javascript.
WTF does that mean?
too, WPF lacks of some goodies WinForms has.
Like what? Apart from the fact that Winforms to WPF is a hell of a lot harder to migrate to than this will be.





Member since:
2009-07-08
Spoken like someone who hasn't had worked with any of those technologies.
I used to develop multimedia applications in WPF. I could build complex user interfaces in WPF in a fraction of the time it would take using a more traditional framework.
WPF, FLEX, and now QML truly allow designers to get more involved with the development process. On of the best developers I've worked with was a XAML (WPF xml) guru who couldn't write a line of code in any language.
If you want to develop ugly boring business apps, the go ahead and code in MFC or Winforms.
Edited 2010-10-14 14:14 UTC