Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Oct 2010 21:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 445617
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Its a myth. It is what vested interests (such as PC World for example) want everyone to believe.
There are other sources of articles which point in entirely the opposite direction:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2368511,00.asp
You can win on price but not suffer for performance running desktop Linux:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2368585,00.asp
Desktop Linux will be far easier and cheaper for you to maintain, which is a cost that you will never see included in Microsoft-sponsored "TCO" studies:
http://blogs.techworld.com/war-on-error/2010/10/heres-a-crazy-secur...
There are many, many use cases where running Windows is pure insanity, and where desktop Linux is a perfect solution.
Just don't expect them to show up in sales figures when the only thing you are allowed to buy in commercial consumer computer shops is Windows.
Edited 2010-10-18 22:53 UTC