Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Oct 2010 21:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 445688
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Nobody cares about Linux on the desktop
by Panajev on Tue 19th Oct 2010 08:40
in reply to "RE[3]: Nobody cares about Linux on the desktop"
I'd be more inclined to believe you if I had never used Linux before and seen GUI's basically lying about the state of the system (DHCP server being active and already running, ok older RH release), not being able to customize all the aspects without going down to the terminal, etc...
Linux is not ready to be fully used, configured, and troubleshooted without using the Terminal. Windows is 98% near that goalpost, MacOS X is 96% (100% for some people) near that goalpost, but Linux is far from being anywhere near the goalpost mentioned.




Member since:
2007-02-17
No they don't. When reKonq or Dolphin or any other native-to-the-desktop program needs to associate an unknown file type with an application, a dialog box appears which is a graphical mini-representation of the systems menu. You just pick an application as if from the menus, it even has the standard icons and application groups just as shown on the system's menu. For example, for a plain text file, one can choose the Kate editor icon from the Utilities group of applications to open it, just as one would from the system's main menu.
I'm not totally sure about Firefox, but it should use the same mime types as native KDE applications. I think there might be a Firefox plugin which sets this up.
Within Dolphin, the KDE File Manager, one can right-click on any file type and select "properties", and then click on the "configuration" icon within the properties dialog box. This lets you add or remove applications associated with that file type, again using a GUI selector of applications equivalent to the systems menu. One can also set the associated applications order of preference by moving applications up or down in the list.
Whenever one adds a new application, it claims file type as being associated with it, and so it is automatically added to the lists of the file types it knows how to handle, normally as the last preference in the application order. If one want to change the preferred order, one can do it through GUIs without having to know the application's executable name or its location within the filesystem.
At least on KDE this is all so, I can't speak for GNOME because I haven't used it in a while now.
Why do people persist with these outdated nonsense claims about Linux being supposedly hard to use? It is just utter rubbish.
Edited 2010-10-19 05:21 UTC