Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Oct 2010 12:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 445934
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-08
I think that nothing, except for spec sheet padding, can justify inclusion of multi-touch on a DAP that has the size of the Nano. Touchscreens why not, for portability it makes sense (although my experience of touch on the D2 is that it's already a bit small for that, and nano is even smaller if I remember well), but multitouch on a nano is just as relevant at video playback on an iPod shuffle's power LED : physically, a human being equipped with average fingers can not take advantage of it.
Edited 2010-10-20 10:04 UTC