Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Oct 2010 22:22 UTC, submitted by vivainio
Thread beginning with comment 446159
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Their acts speak to them
That's so true, wasn't Nokia the one who oposed to ogg video as a HTML5 standar? and the one who is know using patents to sue the competence? What does that speak to you? oh and ain't Nokia being acussed of human righs violations an opression?
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/10/saharkhiz-v-nokia
Edited 2010-10-21 03:34 UTC
But even if they preferred to make it proprietary and never released the code, the open source community would still develop an LGPL Qt 4.7.
As it is, not only would the comunity have that option the last Qt release would become released under a BSD license making it possible for anyone to make their own proprietary version if they so wishes.




Member since:
2006-01-03
Nokia will surely use LGPL as a license for 4.7. Their acts speak to them -- so far.
But even if they preferred to make it proprietary and never released the code, the open source community would still develop an LGPL Qt 4.7. Nokia couldprevent that, even if they wanted.