Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Oct 2010 09:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 446498
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-09-30
This is what I thought, too, upon reading the "the version of Java that is ported by Apple, and that ships with Mac OS X" part of the story.
Apple, quite frankly, has done a bad job of maintaining the JDK for their OS, and maybe Oracle doesn't want them dragging the Java brand down further than it already is with consumers.
I use eclipse on OS X 10.6. I have an MBP primarily because I write server-side Java and also Client-side C++ for Mac, Windows, and Linux.
Granted, who the heck knows what Apple is doing these days, so I also share the worry about Apple's goals here.