Linked by David Adams on Fri 22nd Oct 2010 16:36 UTC, submitted by Amy Bennett
Windows As of today, Microsoft won't allow manufacturers to install XP on new netbooks," says blogger Kevin Fogarty. "That doesn't mean corporate customers who special-order hardware with XP won't be able to get it, or even that its market share ( 60 percent!) will drop any time soon.... It just means XP has taken the first babystep toward obsolescence and the long (really long, considering its market share) slide down toward the pit of minor operating systems like the MacOS X (4.39 percent) , Java ME (.95 percent) and "Other" (which I think is an alternative spelling for "Linux" (.85 percent).
Thread beginning with comment 446729
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Maybe an overdue step
by jbauer on Sat 23rd Oct 2010 09:14 UTC in reply to "Maybe an overdue step"
jbauer
Member since:
2005-07-06

By dis-allowing the Windows XP option for new netbook/netpad devices, Microsoft may actually help the development and viral dissemination of a Linux-based netbook/netpad focused user experience. This is my hope.


Sure, 'cause they're gonna be replacing it with Windows 3.1, a system that actually Linux might have a chance to beat.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Maybe an overdue step
by Nth_Man on Sat 23rd Oct 2010 11:53 in reply to "RE: Maybe an overdue step"
Nth_Man Member since:
2010-05-16

Sure, 'cause they're gonna be replacing it with Windows 3.1, a system that actually Linux might have a chance to beat.

You obviously have no idea of what you are talking about. :-(

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Maybe an overdue step
by jbauer on Sat 23rd Oct 2010 14:06 in reply to "RE[2]: Maybe an overdue step"
jbauer Member since:
2005-07-06

"Sure, 'cause they're gonna be replacing it with Windows 3.1, a system that actually Linux might have a chance to beat.

You obviously have no idea of what you are talking about. :-(
"

Obviously. Everyone who has a clue in IT is cheering for Linux all the way. The rest, poor souls, ignorant morons, all of us.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Maybe an overdue step
by bassbeast on Mon 25th Oct 2010 00:00 in reply to "RE: Maybe an overdue step"
bassbeast Member since:
2007-11-11

Actually as much as the FOSS crowd would boo, I honestly think Win 3.x would be a good description of why Linux isn't setting markets on fire. With 3.x what you had was a shell on top of DOS, with Linux what you have is a DE on top of Bash. Just like how we had to drop into DOS to get things unborked, so to in Linux does one often need Bash for waaay too many things.

Just look at Apple: love them or hate them they have made the GUI and user experience job #1, and it shows. Same with Windows 7. In either OS one need NEVER touch the CLI, even for admin tasks, because everything is based on the GUI. With Linux not only were the distros chosen for netbooks lousy, but even if they'd have went with Ubuntu any problems equal crawling some forum and looking for a "fix" that ALWAYS starts with "open up bash and type" this big mess that often needs to be "tweaked" to work.

So I'd say the core problem is Linux is at its heart a server OS, being written by developers that know and love the CLI. This is completely the opposite of the consumer market, where most don't even know their OS HAS a CLI, much less has ANY desire to interact with it. Ultimately if Linux is to have ANY chance at the mainstream consumer market I believe that a desktop distro like Ubuntu needs to fork the kernel away from Linus and the server devs, institute a "pixel perfect" guideline similar to Apple, and demand CLI DIAF. Make the OS a desktop and desktop ONLY, and then it really has a shot.

But trying to force users to do things the Unix way will only end in fail, which is why the big box retailers and little shops like mine don't carry Linux.

Reply Parent Score: 1