Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Oct 2010 22:22 UTC, submitted by vivainio
Thread beginning with comment 446771
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: I don't like dual lience.
by Nth_Man on Sun 24th Oct 2010 06:20
in reply to "RE[2]: I don't like dual lience."
RE[4]: I don't like dual lience.
by vivainio on Sun 24th Oct 2010 06:41
in reply to "RE[3]: I don't like dual lience."
Ok. Now what?
With commercial license, you can ship your own modified version of Qt without disclosing your modifications. Most users don't modify Qt.





Member since:
2008-12-26
If someone wants to share their code, license it free, that's ok.
If someone wants to take advantages of free/libre software... but deny this to others... support Qt at least.
It's 2010, Qt is under LGPL. It's perfectly okay to use Qt with closed source software without paying anyone.