Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Oct 2010 19:00 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Thread beginning with comment 447015
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
If users knew what they wanted rather than having choices made for them... Windows wouldn't be around and Apple wouldn't be as closed down as they are.
Users/Consumers are being *told* what they want and being given what is already being developed.
Users/Consumers are being *told* what they want and being given what is already being developed.
Yep! you got the point!
I really don't like when companies makes choices for me, but guess that vast majority of users does!
Thumbs up for you
If users knew what they wanted rather than having choices made for them... Windows wouldn't be around and Apple wouldn't be as closed down as they are.
That's not the part I have a problem with.
I have a problem with him lying about why they are switching. He should just state their (his) plans and be done with it.
RE: Better than Gnome 3 Shell
by frytvm on Mon 25th Oct 2010 22:40
in reply to "Better than Gnome 3 Shell"
If they held a vote, say on their website, then mostly vocal power-users would respond, who are often afraid of change because they've mastered what's there already (see the "ribbon" fears).
I assume users want an intuitive, usable interface. If that's what they feel they have, then its what the users should get.





Member since:
2009-08-26
I don't buy his explanation though.
It isn't about what the users want, if it was then he would hold a vote.