Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Oct 2010 18:02 UTC, submitted by viator
Legal If you can't compete, litigate. This train of thought has been quite prevalent among major technology companies as of late, most notably by Apple and Microsoft, who both cannot compete with Android on merit, so they have to resort to patent lawsuits and FUD. Both Asustek and Acer have revealed that Microsoft plans to impose royalty fees upon the two Taiwanese hardware makers to prevent them from shipping Android and/or Chrome OS devices.
Thread beginning with comment 447473
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: how about
by MattPie on Thu 28th Oct 2010 18:34 UTC in reply to "how about"
MattPie
Member since:
2006-04-18

These manufacturers give two fingers to the US market and sell exclusivey to the rest of the world.

Chopping off a significant portion of your target market for ideology is rarely a good business idea.

Edited 2010-10-28 18:34 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: how about
by lemur2 on Thu 28th Oct 2010 22:09 in reply to "RE: how about"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

These manufacturers give two fingers to the US market and sell exclusivey to the rest of the world. Chopping off a significant portion of your target market for ideology is rarely a good business idea.


If this is so, why don't Microsoft write their applications to be easily portable, so that they could sell the exact same version of MS Office for Windows, Mac and Linux?

Doing that would expand the market into which Microsoft could sell Office, and it would also mean that Microsoft would not have to spend energy and money on lawyers trying to suppress other operating systems.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: how about
by JAlexoid on Fri 29th Oct 2010 22:28 in reply to "RE: how about"
JAlexoid Member since:
2009-05-19

Chopping off a significant portion of your target market for ideology is rarely a good business idea.


I totally agree, it's just I don't agree that the royalties for patents that are valid in one, or a small number of countries, would be spread out globally. Specially, where the company that pays the patent royalties isn't even based in US (I'm talking HTC, Asus...).

Reply Parent Score: 2