Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Oct 2010 20:07 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 447517
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Without checking the code did it occur to anyone that it might have been an inverse order that the jdk copied the code from harmony.
However, *with* looking at the code, it's obvious what way copying (or again, decompiling) happened.
That is the wrong (strawman) argument now, focus on other matters Thom presented.
This issue isn't really worth discussing until someone spends some time (20 minutes?) with Harmony VCS and tracks this down.
Edited 2010-10-28 21:34 UTC




Member since:
2006-01-18
Without checking the code did it occur to anyone that it might have been an inverse order that the jdk copied the code from harmony.