Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 9th Nov 2010 22:24 UTC, submitted by koki
Thread beginning with comment 449320
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Exactly. It's a lot of hullabaloo over nothing.
Not looking to provide flame bate (though this will probably be interpreted as such by some) but doesn't that pretty much describe the FSF these days? There was a time when the FSF, and those involved with it, contributed a lot of valuable things to the F/OSS landscape. Is that time past? All I see from them now is new licenses and complaints when people don't follow what the FSF thinks they should be doing. Quite frankly, I find them annoying. Do they do anything productive these days? That's a genuine question, I'd really like to know since all I see from them lately is bitching and moaning about one thing or another.
It's firmware, it not part of the Linux kernel and it does not run in the OS. Firmware != driver. Heck, even OpenBSD ships with firmware blobs. It would have been nice if the devices in question did not require firmware upload to work but in the end it doesn't really matter and it doesnt make Linux non-free.
But the difference is OpenBSD will only distribute firmware if it is under acceptable licensing terms.





Member since:
2005-08-18
It's firmware, it not part of the Linux kernel and it does not run in the OS. Firmware != driver. Heck, even OpenBSD ships with firmware blobs. It would have been nice if the devices in question did not require firmware upload to work but in the end it doesn't really matter and it doesnt make Linux non-free.
To say that this makes Linux not OSS is incredibly clueless.