Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 18th Nov 2010 23:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 450553
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't think this will pass a supreme court review. Then again, sex offender lists have been upheld, so.
Worth reading,
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101118/10291211924/the-19-senato...
Maybe less future votes will go to those guys (though I'm sure RIAA and the like have plenty of senators in their sleeve anyway).
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101118/10291211924/the-19-senato...
Maybe less future votes will go to those guys (though I'm sure RIAA and the like have plenty of senators in their sleeve anyway).
The most surprising of these is Al Franken, one of only three US senators known to use a computer.
If he voted for this, I wonder what was in the versions that didn't make it.
The most surprising of these is Al Franken, one of only three US senators known to use a computer.
Wow, Al Franken voted for this?
Assuming there were an open debate about this, I'm sure somebody told them how easy it would be to work around the DNS issue, and they went for it anyway? I'm not quite as cynical as some might be, so I assume that at least their heart was in the right place on this. But even assuming they're just being paid off by the content industry, even the content industry can't be stupid enough to think this is actually going to work?
Edited 2010-11-19 03:58 UTC





Member since:
2010-09-25
Worth reading,
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101118/10291211924/the-19-senato...
Maybe less future votes will go to those guys (though I'm sure RIAA and the like have plenty of senators in their sleeve anyway).