To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Android does not have multitasking either actually. You should try it on WebOS, Symbian or Maemo. Once you have tried it, you will see what I am talking about. It is really a feature that makes your phone more valuable.
Actually the web site you linked to is Apple. this is the only site that pretend that iOS has multitasking. Every other site say it is disappointing and believe me it is.
Even engadget says it:
http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/iphone-3g-ios-4-and-you-whats-mi...
This is Engadget, the most pro-Apple site you can find on the web bar Apple's own site.
Here is what Ars says about it:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2010/06/ars-reviews-ios-4-what...
Ars is also considered a very pro-Apple web site.
Edited 2010-11-20 16:39 UTC
Every other site say it is disappointing and believe me it is.
I don't need to read the sites, as I actually use 4th gen device.
Obviously you have messed things up.
Your engadget link shows iPhone3G with iOS4.
In context of iPhone4 / iPod Touch, the following quote is completely wrong.
You should try it on WebOS, Symbian or Maemo.
As I said, the "real" multitasking, where all programms are expandedd in memory is not a good choice for mobile gadget, because of limited amount of RAM and performace. I don't want a demanging tasks to run in background to mess with my smoothly working foreground app, except for music/downloading (what works perfectly on iOS).
As I said, I prefer PERFECT experience without a single dropped frame to 2 seconds time economy.
I used Symbian S60 and programmed for it in the past. It was awkward, terrible platform.
Edited 2010-11-22 10:35 UTC





Member since:
2005-08-09
You open a web site that is slow while checking emails while playing music while video chatting on skype, moving quickly from app to app.
So what is the problem?
http://www.apple.com/iphone/features/multitasking.html
I expected to see something spectacular.
Not to how to save 2 seconds while waiting for website to load. I prefer to be sure what apps will not crash inexpectedly because of memory allocation failure or affect the smoothness of foreground app scrolling.
LOL, while writing this message my Android system freezed when I pressed submit button, forcing me to retype the entire post. Wish them burn in hell.
I didn't tried videochatting yet, but I hardly see myself playing music and videochatting at the same time.
If web site loading is slow, why should I consume extra bandwidth to check emails or videochatting(!) ?
Web site loading on WIFI typically takes only a few seconds.
Maybe I can switch apps faster, but there is no advantage.
Just tap "home" twice to see a list of running programs and select or kill them as you wish.
How much faster you can do it in Maemo?
waiting in front of your browser for youtube to start.
Ohh! 2 seconds? Not a big deal.
Edited 2010-11-20 11:53 UTC