Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 27th Nov 2010 10:46 UTC
Legal The US is really ramping up its war on intellectual property infringement, a war which I'm sure will be just as successful, cheap and supported by the people as the wars on drugs and terrorism. The US has started seizing the domain names of various websites through ICANN - not because owners of these sites were convicted of anything, but merely because complaints have been filed against them. Anyone want to take a guess how long it will be before the US government blocks WikiLeaks? Update: The blocks function outside of the US too. In other words, the US is forcing its views upon the rest of the world once again.
Thread beginning with comment 451264
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Why not WikiLeaks yet?
by Thom_Holwerda on Sat 27th Nov 2010 11:23 UTC in reply to "Why not WikiLeaks yet?"
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

Th backlash will be bigger if they block WikiLeaks. They're just busy framing it right now. Of course, the smear campaign against its founder continues.

Reply Parent Score: 8

RE[2]: Why not WikiLeaks yet?
by boulabiar on Sat 27th Nov 2010 11:40 in reply to "RE: Why not WikiLeaks yet?"
boulabiar Member since:
2009-04-18

Do you mean that we are now living in a "V for Vendetta" environment ??
TSA, censorship, where are the rights ?

Reply Parent Score: 5

Bill Shooter of Bul Member since:
2006-07-14

I really do respect you Thom, despite your love of unicorns of the pink fluffy variaty. But Julian Assange, while noble for his role in creating wikileaks is a douche-bag in real life. Unfortunately, begin a giant douche-bag isn't a crime yet. But, don't pretend that his douche-ness is part of a vast conspiracy by a government that's unable to do even the simplest jobs correctly.

The truth is the leaks aren't that bad. You have a few idiots that spend all of their time engrossed in the details of the secrecy of war, suddenly losing control of that minutia. They freak out, but the guys with the bigger picture understand how non-valuable that info is to the enemy. Its just mostly embarrassing that it contradicts what the official government line was in the past. People hate it when you catch them in a lie.

Reply Parent Score: 5

tylerdurden Member since:
2009-03-17

How exactly is Assange, a person I am sure you don't know at a personal level, a "douche?"

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Why not WikiLeaks yet?
by Moredhas on Sun 28th Nov 2010 08:25 in reply to "RE[2]: Why not WikiLeaks yet?"
Moredhas Member since:
2008-04-10

I thought the smear campaign went further than casting aspersions on his credibility. Aren't they trying to peg rape or child molestation on him? Hardly requires being a douche to do either of those things, though of course they aren't mutually exclusive. Whether or not he actually is guilty of some crime, I have no knowledge or opinion, but it does seem awfully convenient that he's been charged with something other than violating national security. Call someone a child molester and people start whispering "maybe he is", and, whether or not he's ever convicted or even tried, that corrupts their view of everything he's involved in. Probably wouldn't be hard to pay off a family to claim their kid was a victim. If I were in a high position of power, and needed someone removed without political uproar, I'd probably do that.

I'm not calling him a hero of democracy and freedom, or anything like that, but the US Government obviously sees him as an important embarrassment.

Edited 2010-11-28 08:26 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 6