To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Oracle didn't need to rework Solaris ... it's been evolving nicely on it's own (transparency/OSS issues aside). I look forward to maintaining it at many of my customer sites over the next decade. It's a solid enterprise OS selection and will be for the foreseeable future.
BTW, Solaris 11 Express is both production ready and Oracle supportable, as corrected in the parent article.
Maybe you call up John Fowler, Oracle executive vice president of systems, and tell him he is waisting money because Solaris is so damn fantastic it needs no rework or whatever.
I'm sure the above posters are right about a lot of it being a continuations of Sun's own developments prior to being acquired, but who's to say it's only been a year on Oracle's part. Lot's of the relevant code has been available to Oracle to play with since long before they absorbed Sun. It's entirely possible they were working on tweaks to the platform for their own ends, much like they've tailored some of RHEL's sources as a platform for their products.





Member since:
2008-10-30
In less than a year Oracle has performed a "complete" rework of Solaris? Sure.