To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail...
The CLR is Microsoft's implementation of the CLI, which has also been standardized by ISO (CLI/C# et al., always go through ECMA first, then ISO, then the ECMA docs are updated to match final ISO).
http://www.iso.org/iso/search.htm?qt=Common+Language+Infrastructure...
The CLR is not an implementation of the CLI. The CLR is something far larger and more important. The CLI merely specifies what a language and runtime needs to support, such as common types, to interface with each other.
I didn't know they'd submitted the CLI to the ISO, but the point is that no CLI implementation is workable without a working implementation of a CLR and that hasn't been submitted to the ISO as far as I've ever been aware.
Yeah if you look back at the other replies to my comment you will see that apparently the CLI has been submitted and published by ISO. And the abstract for that paper shows that it contains much the same information as the publically available ECMA335, which is enough to implement the complete CLR.
The only thing that is suspect is patents on extra APIs that are not mentioned in the standards. Please do not expand this to say that C# or the CLR as described in ECMA335 is not safe, because it is.





Member since:
2005-09-23
The CLR hasn't been standardized by the ISO, but C# has, twice.
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail...
Edited 2010-12-14 01:37 UTC