Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Dec 2010 19:19 UTC
Windows The rumours about Windows possibly being ported to ARM has left a lot of people bewildered; why would you port Windows NT when Windows CE 6.0 is a perfectly capable operating system? Putting all the pieces together, it's actually quite clear why you would want Windows NT on ARM: servers.
Thread beginning with comment 454805
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: I just don't see it
by TheGZeus on Mon 27th Dec 2010 01:24 UTC in reply to "I just don't see it"
TheGZeus
Member since:
2010-05-19

You... didn't read any of the comments in this thread. As such, I'm going to make fun of you.

"I personally just don't see that huge advantage of having Windows on ARM?"
Is that a weird typo, a question to yourself, a call to telepaths to scan you, or an attempt at simulating up-speak? No matter which... nah.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: I just don't see it
by SteveB on Mon 27th Dec 2010 15:38 in reply to "RE: I just don't see it"
SteveB Member since:
2005-07-10

Is that a weird typo, a question to yourself, a call to telepaths to scan you, or an attempt at simulating up-speak? No matter which... nah.
Yes. It is a typo. Yeah, yeah. Make your fun ;)

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: I just don't see it
by TheGZeus on Mon 27th Dec 2010 17:14 in reply to "RE[2]: I just don't see it"
TheGZeus Member since:
2010-05-19

I have difficulty leaving schtick lying by the wayside ;)

Reply Parent Score: 2