Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 15th Oct 2005 15:56 UTC
The debate over whether or not RISC OS should be open sourced took another turn this week when Peter Naulls argued that "certain parts" of the OS could be released under an open source licence. The State-side coder behind various ports including Firefox said this would ideally include "crucial parts that affect all users, even if they don't realise it, parts that can be created from scratch and made much better than the Acorn original, and parts which can managed by specific developers who already understand them well."
Thread beginning with comment 45597
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-10-02
Hell yes!
is difficult to say for me. I can't see what they would gain, and I can't see what they would lose.
Wait... uhm.... I guess that was about as informative as your post
Whether or not to open source it (after MYOB's post I'll just call it "it"
But personally I'm like 60/40 in favour of open sourcing (or how it's spelled).