Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Jan 2011 22:24 UTC, submitted by fran
Thread beginning with comment 459788
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: What about portable linux apps?
by merkoth on Thu 27th Jan 2011 12:44
in reply to "RE: What about portable linux apps?"
RE[2]: What about portable linux apps?
by Radio on Thu 27th Jan 2011 13:33
in reply to "RE: What about portable linux apps?"
Portable, standalone apps pose complexity problems in integration, trackability and updating. Indeed, OSX apps (sorry, "software"*), though easy to install ("drag & drop"), have no unified update engine and leave a lot of crap behind when uninstalled...
*now they have "apps" like iOS, which solves the problems of the old method... by copying the central softawre repository linuxes always had. Thus we come full-circle...
RE[3]: What about portable linux apps?
by mgl.branco on Thu 27th Jan 2011 17:51
in reply to "RE[2]: What about portable linux apps?"




Member since:
2007-03-30
No problem with it. But linux people are not known for thinking outside the box. As you can see here they'll fix your genome before reconsidering the problem.