Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Feb 2011 09:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 461986
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't know about MS.
But Nokia has an interesting update policy.
If you buy a free of contract phone you will have updates even after more than an year (I had an 5800 XM).
Why interesting? Because if you have an Orange branded phone (personal experience), sorry, almost no updates.
It's not always the carrier who restricts updates though. Motorola dragged their ass with the 2.1 update for the Cliq, and when they finally did release it, it was a buggy, unstable pile of horse dung. T-Mobile had nothing to do with that, as the update (or lack of it) affected worldwide Motorola customers.





Member since:
2005-07-08
Why do you believe that MS/Nokia will be better in this regard?
It's an honest question as I'm not terribly familiar with either's smartphone policies.
At least with the Nexus One (which I own) there is a community which supports it regardless.