Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Feb 2011 11:35 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless A lot of people are wondering why Nokia didn't choose to go with Android. How can Nokia differentiate themselves when Android is a lot more open and free than Windows Phone 7? As usual, the key to this is in the details. If you read the announcements carefully, you'll see that Microsoft offered Nokia something Google most likely didn't. Update: What a surprise. Elop just confirmed Nokia has a special deal with Microsoft. Whereas HTC, Samsung, and so on are not allowed to customise WP7 - Nokia is, further confirming my theory.
Thread beginning with comment 461996
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Good outcome
by TBPrince on Fri 11th Feb 2011 12:56 UTC
Member since:

Basically Nokia will have a customized version of Windows Phone 7 and will be able to deliver hardware innovation at a faster pace, letting MS develop OS support for its hardware stuff.

It's a great outcome because:

1) Nokia is very innovative in hardware support and has been damaged by not having an OS capable of use such innovative hardware quickly and good enough.

2) Microsoft will suddenly jump from being a niche player in mobile OSes to (potentially) be the the market leader when Nokia will finish integrating its line of phones with WP7

3) Microsoft has joined forces with leader market device maker.

4) Nokia suddenly has a modern platform and an entire eco-system to channel devices and services

5) Microsoft eco-system promises (promises, and I hope it will fulfill) to be opener than Apple's as Microsoft doesn't need to force its partners to surrender shares in income to basically any services they deliver (apps, services and so on). That means more margins to Nokia.

6) Not only, as Thom said, Google doesn't need Nokia so it would not care to customize its OS for Nokia, but the real problem about Google partnership is Google lives by its services and plans to extend them. Cell cos are desperately trying to find room to provide their own value-added stuff and get margins from that. Google wouldn't let Nokia develop a wide array of services as that would jeopardize Google's own services. Microsoft, though interested in channelling its services, depends less on them because of Windows, Office, Windows Server and so on. Nokia might find more room to negotiate agreements to channel its services via its phones.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Good outcome
by tomz on Fri 11th Feb 2011 22:06 in reply to "Good outcome"
tomz Member since:

Except - if they totally change the Windows 7 platform (e.g. add Qt) it is no longer part of the WinPh7 ecosystem.

If they don't change it, they are an "also ran" competing with Samsung and others that already have devices there and already know how to do the platform.

It isn't an exclusive deal as far as I know. It may just prove that it wasn't the OS - they might have even more really great hardware and then blow the integration. They need to be more than marginally better than the current players, but how do you do that with a "standard"? Price or perfrormance?

Will the Ovi store be killed before the WinPhone7 store has 100k apps?

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Good outcome
by aliquis on Wed 16th Feb 2011 03:40 in reply to "RE: Good outcome"
aliquis Member since:

Yeah... How could Nokia ever succesfully compete with Samsung on the same platform?

Wait what? ...

Reply Parent Score: 2