Linked by David Adams on Mon 7th Mar 2011 17:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 465337
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: maybe its the license
by ruinevil on Wed 9th Mar 2011 02:19
in reply to "RE: maybe its the license"
LLVM/clang support is in the works, since they can only ship an ancient version of GPLv2 gcc in their base. Because of this mplayer-svn does not compile.
The other things you asked of would need significant manpower, and would be better served by forking and rewriting everything. Rewriting everything tends to create a new set of bugs though. The first few iterations would suck.
RE[3]: maybe its the license
by Oliver on Wed 9th Mar 2011 08:56
in reply to "RE[2]: maybe its the license"




Member since:
2006-01-22
Contrary to other opinions I agree with you. What I also see as a big talent drain is the Linuxulator. They should have dropped the Linux emulator layer. There is a lot of OSS that is not closed and has value. Finally I believe they should focus on bringing new tech inside. Apple has published a lot of code and unfortunately the FreeBSD project did nothing to incorporate it. IOKit is a very big tool along with older XFree/IOKit bindings. I also believe that they should focus more on uKernel designs, revamp DDE-Freebsd and embrace Clang. At least they could spin off a BSD-NG design with all the above fresh tech and co-operate closely with Haiku and IllumOS.