Linked by David Adams on Mon 7th Mar 2011 17:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 465398
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-12-25
Alright, I might have been convinced the license could have something to do with it. I also think the lack of focus is a big part. Well, I really think it's more of a lack of manpower than focus, though. Which is kind of the point of the article in the first place. FreeBSD could definitely benefit from somebody who was willing to throw money at their lack of resource problem. As long as that money didn't shift their focus to world domination through software and mobile devices. I guess that would be ok, as long as it was well written, stable software.
I know FreeBSD is geared more toward server use, but it is so fun as a desktop. Gentoo is/was just a fad. What's wrong with ArchLinux?