Linked by Oliver on Fri 11th Mar 2011 23:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 466237
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Not mutually exclusive
by Soulbender on Tue 15th Mar 2011 18:01
in reply to "RE[7]: Not mutually exclusive"
I remember back in the 90's when the UNIX old guard used to laugh at Linux and say it matters not because it does not run any big servers or super computers, it does not scale beyond 4 cpus its only usable on x86 and mk68 cpus etc...
Sounds just like how many Linux users treat BSD these days...
RE[9]: Not mutually exclusive
by hamster on Wed 16th Mar 2011 11:02
in reply to "RE[8]: Not mutually exclusive"




Member since:
2008-09-24
Can you make a point without trolling Linux?
Yes Linux is a Unix clone a clean room interpretation of UNIX if you will. Its goals is whatever one can think of and more!
I remember back in the 90's when the UNIX old guard used to laugh at Linux and say it matters not because it does not run any big servers or super computers, it does not scale beyond 4 cpus its only usable on x86 and mk68 cpus etc...
now Linux leads the way in terms super computer use, its more portable than NetBSD, it scales up and beyond 4,096 cpus. Now if I can go back to thoser usergroups I used to read and say how do you like Linux now? maybe they would be speechless!