Linked by Brooss on Tue 15th Mar 2011 23:32 UTC
Benchmarks A comment on the recent article about the Bali release of Googles WebM tools (libvpx) claimed that one of the biggest problems facing the adoption of WebM video was the slow speed of the encoder as compared to x264. This article sets out to benchmark the encoder against x264 to see if this is indeed true and if so, how significant the speed difference really is.
Thread beginning with comment 466389
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: WebM vs H.264 benchmark
by kahen on Wed 16th Mar 2011 11:33 UTC in reply to "WebM vs H.264 benchmark"
kahen
Member since:
2009-09-07

5) Send the original file through a blur filter (no compression) to show how effing stupid tuning for PSNR is

Reply Parent Score: 2