Linked by Brooss on Tue 15th Mar 2011 23:32 UTC
Benchmarks A comment on the recent article about the Bali release of Googles WebM tools (libvpx) claimed that one of the biggest problems facing the adoption of WebM video was the slow speed of the encoder as compared to x264. This article sets out to benchmark the encoder against x264 to see if this is indeed true and if so, how significant the speed difference really is.
Thread beginning with comment 466417
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Things we already knew about
by Timmmm on Wed 16th Mar 2011 15:29 UTC in reply to "RE: Things we already knew about"
Member since:

> WebM has probably surpassed H264 now in quality/bit

Rubbish. Show me an example.

Reply Parent Score: 1