Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 17th Mar 2011 13:19 UTC
Legal And so Sony's crusade against Playstation 3 hacker George "Geohot" Hotz continues. After Sony getting all of Geohot's computers and access to server logs and personal details from many of his websites and social media accounts, Sony has now been given access to Geohot's PayPal account, and all information within it - including of the people he has had financial dealings with.
Thread beginning with comment 466605
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by viton
by Thom_Holwerda on Fri 18th Mar 2011 00:05 UTC in reply to "Comment by viton"
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

t was Hotz who released the vital information/tools and enabled piracy just to earn some more fame.


Proof?

He did nothing to "reimplement OtherOS".


He released modified firmware that re-enabled OtherOS. In other words, you are lying.

Obviously, master key to decrypt and re-sign hacked executables is intended for piracy, but not "OtherOS" feature.


You are lying again. Those keys were needed to sign executables. FOR HOMEBREW. OTHER people used this information to enable piracy. You would be okay with suing the hardware store becuase the sold an axe that would later be used to murder someone.

Thom, please stop painting him as innocent sheep.


If you give me proof instead of lies, I might.

He knew that Sony may take appropriate steps because of his actions. And that didn't stop him.


Wouldn't stop me either:

erk: C0 CE FE 84 C2 27 F7 5B D0 7A 7E B8 46 50 9F 93 B2 38 E7 70 DA CB 9F F4 A3 88 F8 12 48 2B E2 1B
riv: 47 EE 74 54 E4 77 4C C9 B8 96 0C 7B 59 F4 C1 4D
pub: C2 D4 AA F3 19 35 50 19 AF 99 D4 4E 2B 58 CA 29 25 2C 89 12 3D 11 D6 21 8F 40 B1 38 CA B2 9B 71 01 F3 AE B7 2A 97 50 19
R: 80 6E 07 8F A1 52 97 90 CE 1A AE 02 BA DD 6F AA A6 AF 74 17
n: E1 3A 7E BC 3A CC EB 1C B5 6C C8 60 FC AB DB 6A 04 8C 55 E1
K: BA 90 55 91 68 61 B9 77 ED CB ED 92 00 50 92 F6 6C 7A 3D 8D
Da: C5 B2 BF A1 A4 13 DD 16 F2 6D 31 C0 F2 ED 47 20 DC FB 06 70

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Comment by viton
by danielcavanagh on Fri 18th Mar 2011 03:55 in reply to "RE: Comment by viton"
danielcavanagh Member since:
2010-12-08

haha. why oh why can't i upvote your posts, thom?

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Comment by viton
by viton on Mon 21st Mar 2011 11:49 in reply to "RE: Comment by viton"
viton Member since:
2005-08-09

Proof?
Tools and published keys are not enough?

He released modified firmware that re-enabled OtherOS.
Ok. He could stay at this point. But that doesn't bring enough fame.

Those keys were needed to sign executables. FOR HOMEBREW.
There is no difference between "homebrew" exe or unsigned game exe.

You would be okay with suing the hardware store becuase the sold an axe that would later be used to murder someone.
Even if this "axe" was prohibited to distribute?

If you give me proof instead of lies, I might.
The proof was attached to your post =)

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Comment by viton
by Alfman on Mon 21st Mar 2011 22:02 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by viton"
Alfman Member since:
2011-01-28

"You would be okay with suing the hardware store becuase the sold an axe that would later be used to murder someone."

"Even if this 'axe' was prohibited to distribute?"

Terrible metaphor, but which law was broken?
As mentioned above, the DMCA has exceptions for what he's done.

Reply Parent Score: 1