Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 17th Mar 2011 13:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 466605
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by viton
by danielcavanagh on Fri 18th Mar 2011 03:55
in reply to "RE: Comment by viton"
Proof?
Tools and published keys are not enough?
He released modified firmware that re-enabled OtherOS.
Ok. He could stay at this point. But that doesn't bring enough fame.
Those keys were needed to sign executables. FOR HOMEBREW.
There is no difference between "homebrew" exe or unsigned game exe.
You would be okay with suing the hardware store becuase the sold an axe that would later be used to murder someone.
Even if this "axe" was prohibited to distribute?
If you give me proof instead of lies, I might.
The proof was attached to your post =)




Member since:
2005-06-29
Proof?
He released modified firmware that re-enabled OtherOS. In other words, you are lying.
You are lying again. Those keys were needed to sign executables. FOR HOMEBREW. OTHER people used this information to enable piracy. You would be okay with suing the hardware store becuase the sold an axe that would later be used to murder someone.
If you give me proof instead of lies, I might.
Wouldn't stop me either:
erk: C0 CE FE 84 C2 27 F7 5B D0 7A 7E B8 46 50 9F 93 B2 38 E7 70 DA CB 9F F4 A3 88 F8 12 48 2B E2 1B
riv: 47 EE 74 54 E4 77 4C C9 B8 96 0C 7B 59 F4 C1 4D
pub: C2 D4 AA F3 19 35 50 19 AF 99 D4 4E 2B 58 CA 29 25 2C 89 12 3D 11 D6 21 8F 40 B1 38 CA B2 9B 71 01 F3 AE B7 2A 97 50 19
R: 80 6E 07 8F A1 52 97 90 CE 1A AE 02 BA DD 6F AA A6 AF 74 17
n: E1 3A 7E BC 3A CC EB 1C B5 6C C8 60 FC AB DB 6A 04 8C 55 E1
K: BA 90 55 91 68 61 B9 77 ED CB ED 92 00 50 92 F6 6C 7A 3D 8D
Da: C5 B2 BF A1 A4 13 DD 16 F2 6D 31 C0 F2 ED 47 20 DC FB 06 70