Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th May 2011 20:41 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 471972
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-12-22
You do not need to worry about MS patents on C# or the CLR but not because of that agreement. Novell has specifically stated in the past that the patent deal had nothing to do with Mono.
However, the Microsoft Community Promise (MCP), the fact that the .NET micro edition is open source, the fact that several Microsoft technologies have been released under the Apache 2.0 license, and other reasons do mean that you do not need to worry about C# or CLR patents.
ADO.NET and some parts of ASP.NET could keep you up at night if you are truly paranoid. But if that is the case, I do not know how you could use anything else without cold sweats either.